Newsom Signs Bill Mandating the Removal of the Word “Squaw” Forever
Valley Well Positioned to Accelerate Its Steady Clean Air Transformation
Fresno Delegation Headed to Armenia on Medical Relief Mission
Community’s Long History of Investing in This Region
Enviros Dismayed After Gov. Newsom Vetoes Arambula’s Air Bill
Newsom Signs Bill Mandating the Removal of the Word “Squaw” Forever
Be Informed Before You Vote With Nonpartisan CalMatters Guide
Burial, Cremation, or Human Composting? Californians Can Now Decide
California Attorney General Takes Over LA Political Corruption Probe
Blind Dog Freed from Hole by Rescuers at SoCal Construction Site
Court Deals Heavy Blow to Trump in Mar-a-Lago Records Probe
Navy Bribery Fugitive ‘Fat Leonard’ Nabbed in Venezuela
Bezos Rocket Crashes With No One on Board
Americans Pay Tribute to Victims of 9/11 Terror Attacks
Elected Officials, Police Chiefs on Leaked Oath Keepers List
Palestine’s Abbas Says Hope of Peace With Israel Is ‘Waning’
Russian Men Join Exodus, Fearing Call-up to Fight in Ukraine
Iranians Protesting Woman’s Death Chant ‘Death to the Dictator!’
Security Council Must Tell Russia to Stop Nuke Threats: Blinken
Missile Strikes Continue in Ukraine Despite Prisoner Swap
Unlike LA, Schools in Clovis, Fresno Already Have Fentanyl Antidote on Hand
State Ed Delays Test Score Release. Fresno Reports Lower Scores.
Clovis Bootcamps Prepare Area Students for Tough Medical School Exam
Bullard Response to Shooter Hoax Highlights Communication Flaws, Parent Says
Active Shooter Hoax Hits Bullard High. Will It Affect Cellphone Ban?
Valley Well Positioned to Accelerate Its Steady Clean Air Transformation
Zakaria: Putin Has Just Made the World a Far More Dangerous Place
Dems’ Criticism of DA Smittcamp Is Straight From Trump Playbook
COVID-19 School Closures Undermined Learning
Caballero Urges Stronger ‘Buy American’ Policy on the State, Local Level
Dodger Great Maury Wills, Who Revived the Art of the Stolen Base, Dies at 89
Judge Is Two Home Runs Shy of Setting Baseball’s ‘Real’ Season Record
Spending Over California’s Legal Gambling Initiatives Breaks Records
Bulldogs Squander Opportunities in Last-Play Loss to Oregon State
‘Serving’ Time: California Prison Inmates Find Community Through Tennis
UNFILTERED – DeSantis’ Treatment of Immigrants, Elections Update, Fresno County Redistricting
UNFILTERED – Keeping Them Honest In The Valley
UNFILTERED – Bullard High, McCarthy Visit, Downtown Development & Restaurant Robots!
UNFILTERED – Fresno Area High School Gives Students A Choice On Cellphones
UNFILTERED – Cellphone Ban, TJ Cox, Fresno State Sales Tax, Save Mart, Bulldog Football, Injection Sites Veto
With more than 100,000 people living on California’s streets, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a first-of-its kind law on Wednesday that could force some of them into treatment as part of a program he describes as “care” but opponents argue is cruel.
Newsom signed the Community Assistance, Recovery and Empowerment Act on Wednesday. It would let family members, first responders and others ask a judge to draw up a treatment plan for someone diagnosed with certain disorders, including schizophrenia. Those who refuse could be placed under a conservatorship and ordered to comply.
Right now, homeless people with severe mental health disorders bounce from the streets to jails and hospitals. They can be held against their will at a psychiatric hospital for up to three days. But they must be released if they promise to take medication and follow up with other services.
The new law would let a court order a treatment plan for up to one year, which could be extended for a second year. The plan could include medication, housing and therapy. While it shares some elements of programs in other states, the system would be the first of its kind in the country, according to the office of Democratic state Sen. Tom Umberg, a co-author of the law.
For decades, California has mostly treated homelessness as a local problem, funneling billions of dollars to city and county governments each year for various treatment programs. But despite all of that spending, homelessness remains one of the state’s most pressing and visible issues.
“Continue to do what you’ve done and you get what you got. And look what we’ve got. It’s unacceptable,” Newsom said Wednesday before signing the law. “This (law) has been architected completely differently than anything you’ve seen in the state of California, arguably in the last century.”
In a year when Newsom is on his way to a shoo-in reelection bid with speculation building about his future presidential aspirations, this new program prompted criticism from both sides of the political spectrum, with some on the left arguing it goes too far while others on the right saying it does not go far enough. Some progressives have spoken out against Newsom blocking certain priorities, including vetoing a bill that would have authorized supervised safe-injection sites for drug users and opposing a new tax on millionaires that would pay for more electric cars.
Newsom signed the law over the strong objections of the American Civil Liberties Union of California, Human Rights Watch, Disability Rights California and numerous other organizations that work with homeless people, minority communities and people with disabilities who say the new program will violate civil rights.
They say that courts are a frightening place for many people with severe mental illness and coercion is antithetical to the peer-based model that is critical to recovery. In other words, critics say, a person needs to want to get help and that could take months or years.
“This outdated and coercive model of placing disabled folks in courtrooms will cause trauma and harm to Californians in vulnerable situations and will reinforce institutional racism,” the ACLU of Southern California said in a message posted to its Twitter account. “We will continue to fight back, and we expect to see legal challenges to stop this misguided plan from harming our community.”
The program is not exclusively for homeless people. It only applies to people who have a severe mental illness — mostly psychotic disorders — and only if they are unlikely to survive safely in the community without supervision or are likely to harm themselves or others.
That means people struggling with alcohol and opioid addiction won’t qualify unless they have a diagnosed psychiatric disorder.
The Newsom administration estimates about 12,000 people could get help under the program. James Gallagher, the Republican leader of the state Assembly, said that’s not enough.
“Although better than nothing, (the Community Assistance, Recovery and Empowerment) court essentially amounts to a new bureaucratic half-measure,” said Gallagher, who like most of his Republican colleagues voted for the bill in the state Legislature. “It’s not the groundbreaking policy change we need. It will help some severely mentally ill people get treatment, but will not stop the explosion of homeless camps in our communities.”
The program would not begin until next year, and only in seven counties: Glenn, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, San Francisco, Stanislaus, and Tuolumne must establish programs by Oct 1, 2023. All other counties would have until Dec. 1, 2024.
Each of California’s 58 counties would have to set up special courts to handle these cases. Counties that don’t participate could be fined up to $1,000 per day.
Newsom said the biggest challenge will be finding and retaining enough health care workers to treat everyone who needs it. The state budget this year includes $296.5 million for the “Workforce for a Healthy California for All Program,” which aims to recruit 25,000 community health workers by 2025.
The National Alliance on Mental Illness of California supports the proposal, as do business organizations and dozens of cities, including the mayors of Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Francisco and San Diego.
They say treatment models and anti-psychotic medications have changed significantly since people were warehoused in institutions. The individual should be able to thrive in the community given the right clinical support team and housing plan, supporters say.
Newsom said he was “exhausted” by arguments from civil liberties groups that the program goes too far.
“Their point of view is expressed by what you see on the streets and sidewalks all across the state,” he said.
Newsom Chides Texas as He Signs Sweeping Climate Legislation
California Sues Amazon, Alleging Antitrust Law Violations